BHB Communications Manager Alan Delmonte said today:
鈥淭here are so many inaccuracies and misrepresentations in Warwick Bartlett鈥檚 statement today that it is difficult to know where to start.
鈥淗e says that he has not spoken to or read of anyone who has signed a BHB licence. The fact is that BHB is receiving an ever-increasing number of signed licences, including from Mr Bartlett鈥檚 own members.
鈥淔urthermore, BHB has taken a substantial number of calls this week from bookmakers who have told us that they will sign a licence before the end of the year to qualify for a BHB concessionary offer.
鈥淥ver recent weeks bookmakers have contacted BHB and a number have intimated that they have not only been confused by what their own industry has been saying, but that they have been given the clear impression that they should not sign.
鈥淏HB has appointed an agency very recently to contact every bookmaker in the country – not, as Mr Bartlett claims, just BBOA members. Bookmakers, all of whom are Racing鈥檚 customers, are being given a fair analysis of the situation, something which their trade associations have singularly failed to do, and it is being stressed to them that BHB鈥檚 concessionary offers will expire on 31st December.
鈥淭he brief which BHB has given to the agency is unequivocal. It has not been stated that without a licence a bookmaker cannot take bets on any sport but that a BHB licence is required in order to take bets legally on British racing where BHB鈥檚 data from 59 courses and pictures from 49 courses is concerned.
鈥淚t is also wrong to say that Peter Savill has alleged collusion between the Tote and bookmakers 鈥� this is not what his letter to the Racing Post said. It is pointless to try to personalise the issue against the BHB Chairman when the BHB Board as a whole is fully supportive of BHB鈥檚 policy.鈥�
